🧩 Philosophy Feb 20, 2026 · Tom Douglas

New Book: Protecting Minds – The Right Against Mental Interference

Practical Ethics Oxford
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 23 💬 0
If your doctor injects you with a vaccine without your consent, or a stranger strokes the back of your neck on a packed train, we would think that they have wronged you, morally speaking. And we might capture this wrong by saying that they have trespassed on your body or infringed your right against bodily interference. By contrast, if a computer game designer uses loot boxes to boost your desire to keep playing a game, or a video platform uses subliminal imagery to create positive associations

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
Corrigibility should not be the only target
LessWrong · 22h ago
📰
Dialogue with Richard Ngo on Alignment, Hierarchical Integrity of Human-AI systems, Revolution, and Power
LessWrong · 1d ago
How to Run Better Research With Agent Fleets
LessWrong · 1d ago
GPT-6.1 Sol is One Sentence Away From Collaborating: Other Models Need More Help
LessWrong · 1d ago
University of Cape Town vs. Free Speech
Daily Nous · 1d ago
📰
How much will conceptual reasoning training transfer to ML research abilities?
LessWrong · 1d ago