🧩 Philosophy 16h ago · berns

Deconfusing Corrigibility

Less Wrong
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
Many thanks to Abram Demski for materially and intellectually supporting this research. Thanks also to Brian Berns, Roman Malov, Gurkenglas, and Lorxus for valuable conversations.IntroductionDespite the central place of corrigibility to theoretical AI alignment, it seems like no one can really agree about what is. Much of this confusion is due to the fact that almost every definition of corrigibility proposed thus far is deficient in one way or another. In particular, the most prevalent existing

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 3h ago
📰
Chain of Thought For Humans
LessWrong · 5h ago
📰
The Most Important Political Dimension is Certainty
LessWrong · 9h ago
Knowingly Wrong
LessWrong · 11h ago
Spontaneous verbal evidence synthesis in LLMs
LessWrong · 11h ago
📰
Academic Freedom
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · 12h ago