🧩 Philosophy 4h ago · MilesTS

Corrigibility should not be the only target

Less Wrong
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 1 💬 0
Many people believe that corrigibility is sufficiently promising to be the primary alignment method people should work on. I outline here several reasons I think that’s not the case.First, it’s hard to imagine AI companies pivoting radically enough to produce AIs trained only for corrigibility. Even with near-superhuman AI-assisted research, presumably developers will know the time pressure and not be willing to try something radically different when their opponents may not. So the realistic cho

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
Dialogue with Richard Ngo on Alignment, Hierarchical Integrity of Human-AI systems, Revolution, and Power
LessWrong · 6h ago
How to Run Better Research With Agent Fleets
LessWrong · 8h ago
GPT-6.1 Sol is One Sentence Away From Collaborating: Other Models Need More Help
LessWrong · 11h ago
University of Cape Town vs. Free Speech
Daily Nous · 12h ago
📰
How much will conceptual reasoning training transfer to ML research abilities?
LessWrong · 13h ago
📰
Herbert Spencer
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · 15h ago