💬 Opinion 11h ago · Jacob Sullum

Other Courts Should Heed a Federal Judge's Warning About Flock-Enabled Mass Surveillance

Reason
Free market and libertarian perspectives
View Channel →
Other Courts Should Heed a Federal Judge's Warning About Flock-Enabled Mass Surveillance
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
Back in 1983, the Supreme Court declared that "a person traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements from one place to another." That increasingly doubtful proposition underpins a nationwide network of more than 144,000 AI-assisted cameras that track the travels of innocent motorists across the country billions of times each week.
So far, state and federal courts have almost uniformly rejected constitutional challenges to automated

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

Sanctuary city whack-a-mole: Same policy, different ZIP code
Opinion: Op-Eds, Editorials, and Political Commentary | The Hill · 4h ago
Denver Post readers weigh Amendment 87’s graduated income tax (Letters)
Editorials, columns, analysis, cartoons and letters | The Denver Post · 4h ago
We prosecute drug dealers. Proposition 132 is the wrong answer to the fentanyl crisis. (Opinion)
Editorials, columns, analysis, cartoons and letters | The Denver Post · 4h ago
College Still Has a Future, but It's No Longer the Default Choice
Reason Magazine · 4h ago
Today in Supreme Court History: October 14, 1911
Reason Magazine · 4h ago
Trump’s Latest Gift to Putin
Project Syndicate · 5h ago