Lightning Strikes Thrice
Source ↗
👁 0
💬 0
The sun is setting shortly and I'm on the go, so my comments about the Missouri order will be brief.
First, the Court only addressed standing in a footnote. I am still not convinced any of the parties had standing but at least 5 members of the Court disagreed, including the Court's leading proceduralist.
Second, the per curiam noted that Justice Kavanaugh's prior orders had no noted dissents. I am still not convinced all three of these orders were unanimous. It may be that Justices Thomas and Al
First, the Court only addressed standing in a footnote. I am still not convinced any of the parties had standing but at least 5 members of the Court disagreed, including the Court's leading proceduralist.
Second, the per curiam noted that Justice Kavanaugh's prior orders had no noted dissents. I am still not convinced all three of these orders were unanimous. It may be that Justices Thomas and Al
Comments (0)