🧩 Philosophy 1d ago · Roman Ross

A Generalist Thinks in Terms of Problems, Not Job Descriptions

Less Wrong
View Channel →
A Generalist Thinks in Terms of Problems, Not Job Descriptions
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
This is a timed post. Every 5 minutes while writing this post, I had to stop to do 15 push-ups, and when I could no longer complete my required number, I had to upload it. My friends thought this would be a fun challenge, but it means that it will likely be less polished than some of my other output.Summary: There has been a lot of talk in the EA/AI safety community recently about what it means to be a “generalist,” but many disagree on what this means. In this post, I give my take on the role:

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
AI Safety Acculturation is Neglected
LessWrong · 6h ago
📰
Endorsing Burhan Azeem for State Senate
LessWrong · 9h ago
LLMs could control their host machines by exploiting inference engines
LessWrong · 12h ago
📰
What just happened? Pragmatism and Pessimization
LessWrong · 19h ago
In search of natural features
LessWrong · 23h ago
📰
PSA: There's a third option in the "measure problem"
LessWrong · 1d ago