💬 Opinion 1d ago · Josh Blackman

Minnesota's "Nudification" Ban Repeats Unconstitutional Errors of Early Revenge Porn Bills

Reason
Free market and libertarian perspectives
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
More than a decade ago, states began enacting laws to prohibit so-called "revenge porn." Some partners would voluntarily exchange sexual photographs, but after the relationship ended, one of the partners would share the intimate images as a form of revenge. Later, the term "non-consensual pornography" became more common, as the pictures were not always shared by former partners.
Many of the early bills imposed what was effectively a strict liability standard without any scienter requirement. Ove

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
Suit Alleging Medical Establishment's Desire to Compel Doctors "to Toe the Line in All Matters Related to COVID …" Can Go Forward
Reason.com · 3h ago
David Wallace-Wells: The Politics of AI Are Shifting in Real Time
The Bulwark · 3h ago
The DSA Is Fully Aware Of The Horrors Of Socialism, But They Don’t Care As Long As They Get Power
The Federalist · 3h ago
📰
"Yes, I'm with … Hamas and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad but up to a Point" Visiting Prof's Suit Against Columbia Dismissed
Reason.com · 3h ago
Trump Is Taking Credit for D.C.'s Crime Drop. Here's What the Data Say.
Reason.com · 3h ago
Justice Department Finds 'Unbroken Pattern' of Sexual Abuse in Two California Women's Prisons
Reason.com · 4h ago