🧩 Philosophy 9h ago · Chandram Dutta

Linear Probes add little for Verifiable Reward Hacking

Less Wrong
View Channel →
Linear Probes add little for Verifiable Reward Hacking
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
SummaryTested whether linear probes can detect reward hacking early during GRPO training on a small model.Used a synthetic arithmetic task with a planted bug in the reward checker.Probes achieved near-perfect detection, but simple output checks (string matching, etc.) worked just as well.The model only learned obvious “lazy” hacks, more subtle ones never appeared.Conclusion: In verifiable reward settings, probes offer little advantage over checking the output directly.IntroductionI wanted to see

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

The Flood, by Anton Leicht
LessWrong · 7h ago
📰
Starting The Sequences: Some brief notes from the preface and the introduction
LessWrong · 7h ago
The Whitney Biennial Should Admit That Emilie Gossiaux Wants to Fuck Their Dog
LessWrong · 7h ago
Optimize for uncertainty
LessWrong · 7h ago
LLMOSES
LessWrong · 8h ago
It’s 2030 and we fucked up. How did it happen?
LessWrong · 9h ago