🧩 Philosophy 5d ago · Tristram McPherson

Supervenience in Ethics

SEP (Stanford Encyc.)
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
[Revised entry by Tristram McPherson on July 2, 2026.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
We sometimes think about the ethical significance of merely possible circumstances. People sometimes wonder, for example, if it would have been wrong to break certain promises that they in fact kept. Examples like this do not exhaust the significance of possibility - or modality more generally - in our ethical thinking. Rather, we also seem to be committed to a certain modal structure in our ethical comm

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

NYT: “The Revenge of the Philosophy Major”
Daily Nous · 2d ago
Drug and Prison Stories: An Interview with William S. Hayes
3:AM Magazine · 2d ago
The Pain in You and the God in You: Carl Jung on the Relationship Between Psychological Suffering and Creativity
The Marginalian · 3d ago
The Art of Losing and the Art of Beckoning Love Back: The Story Behind One of the Greatest Poems Ever Written
The Marginalian · 4d ago
📰
The Kyoto School
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · 4d ago
No One You Love Is Ever Dead: Hemingway on the Most Devastating of Losses and the Meaning of Life
The Marginalian · 4d ago