🇺🇸 USA 12h ago · None

Editorial: Limit corporate activism in Hawaii

Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Honolulu local news
View Channel →
Editorial: Limit corporate activism in Hawaii
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission turned to constitutional principles to overturn restrictions on campaign messaging, and therefore campaign spending, by corporations with just one caveat: that the messaging not be directed by or coordinated with a candidate. The ruling upended century-old restrictions on campaign spending, allowing virtually unlimited spending to influence elections by corporations, associations, institutions, nonprofits

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

📰
Media dinner shooting suspect wrote about targeting administration officials, Trump says
Startribune News · 5h ago
📰
Report: Wolves’ Anthony Edwards out multiple weeks with hyperextended knee, bone bruise
Startribune News · 7h ago
📰
Amid the hockey chaos, Wild winger Matt Boldy keeps a cool head
Startribune News · 9h ago
📰
Most drastic reduction of Catholic parishes ever seen in Minnesota is underway
Startribune News · 10h ago
📰
Analysis: Vikings value experience, explosiveness in building 2026 draft class
Startribune News · 10h ago
📰
What it’s like becoming a U.S. citizen, after the immigration surge
Startribune News · 11h ago