💬 Opinion 20h ago · Eugene Volokh

Massachusetts High Court: Claim Against Meta for Alleged Addiction of Children Can Go Forward Notwithstanding § 230

Reason
Free market and libertarian perspectives
View Channel →
Source ↗ 👁 0 💬 0
From today's opinion in Commonwealth v. Meta Platforms, Inc., written by Justice Dalila Argaez Wendlandt, for a unanimous court:
The Commonwealth alleges that Meta Platforms, Inc., and Instagram, LLC (collectively, Meta), engaged in unfair business practices by designing the Instagram platform to induce compulsive use by children, engaged in deceptive business practices by deliberately misleading the public about the safety of the platform, and created a public nuisance by engaging in these unfa

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

You’re paying taxes — why aren’t billionaires?
Opinion: Op-Eds, Editorials, and Political Commentary | The Hill · 1h ago
He Was ‘Trump Before Trump.’ Now He’s in Trouble.
NYT > Opinion · 2h ago
📰
Follow-Up to "Reproducing Controversial Tweet in News Story = Fair Use" Post
Reason.com · 2h ago
Our Best Stuff From a Very Nerve-Wracking Week
The Dispatch · 2h ago
Gambling addiction is soaring: The SAFE Bet Act can stop it getting worse
Opinion: Op-Eds, Editorials, and Political Commentary | The Hill · 2h ago
The Romance of the Gas-Station Sign
Ideas | The Atlantic · 2h ago